Law Case Study

Law Case Study

Writing a law case study is a typical assignment for a student pursuing a degree in law. If you are attending a law school, then you are probably familiar with the pressure caused by challenging academic assignments. As you progress through your studies, the tasks become more and more difficult. Writing a legal case study is a complicated task to do, especially if you do not have advanced knowledge of the subject-related legal concepts.
Creating a good-looking case study for law students requires a considerable amount of time and effort. To cope with this task successfully, you need to understand the topic, collect appropriate information, as well as follow the common standards of legal writing when working on your document. Many students experience difficulties with this task as they cannot analyze the situation based on circumstantial evidence. If you are new to law writing, you have to consider getting professional writing help online. Alternatively, you may study our guide where you will find many handy tips and suggestions that will help you create an exceptional document.

What Is a Case Study in Law?

Before you find out how to write your paper, you need to clearly reply to the question: “What is case study in law?” In a nutshell, this document is an efficient way to analyze a specific legal topic and come up with the best solution for the problem being investigated. This paper can be written on any topic. In particular, it may analyze the event, person, organization, etc. No matter what subject you are investigating, you will need to carry out in-depth research that will show your professional approach.

When it comes to legal writing, it has to be fact-based, clear, and comprehensive. When working on such a paper, you need to undertake research on a case that has been resolved by a court. Also, this paper can be written to assess the success or failure of the legal matter. To cope with this task at a high level, you need to have a glimpse at how a court procedure works.

Law Case Study Format

As you already know, law writing can be pretty difficult. Many students fail to get good grades for their papers because of inappropriate formatting. When working on a legal case study, you will need to follow a template constituting different sections. In accordance with the traditional structure, you will need to include an introduction, background, evaluation, solutions, recommendations, etc.

Having no sufficient experience in legal writing future lawyers can get stuck on this task. We recommend you look for some online examples that will help you get a source of inspiration.

Before you start working on your task, you have to investigate the subject thoroughly. It is particularly important to include a review of the basic information of the organization you are analyzing. What is more, to bring you a good grade, your paper has to be flawlessly written, well-researched, and correspond to the common rules of the case study format for law students.

Legal Case Study Template

Below, you will find the basic rules of the legal case study format. The parts that have to appear in your legal case study are as follows:

  • The name of the case;
  • Parties;
  • Legal procedure;
  • Issue;
  • Facts;
  • Rule of the law;
  • Analysis;
  • Holding;
  • Judgment;
  • Policy (optional);
  • Dissent.

How to Write a Law Case Study?

Writing a legal case study will take much time as the writing process includes a couple of important stages. In fact, it may take all of your free time leaving you no opportunity to work on other tasks. If you are unable to work on your task on your own, you can always outsource this assignment to our writing team and we will take good care of it. Having the best writers at our service, we are capable of meeting the highest standards of quality.

Now, let us have a closer look at the main sections of a case study in law:

Case Synopsis

Basically, it is an introductory part of your document. The opening part is very important as it is to provide the readers with a brief analysis of the case chosen. Also, you will need to provide essential information about the case such as the parties involved, laws related to the topic, etc. Have a look at some tips collected by our seasoned experts:

  • Your synopsis has to be no more than half of the page;
  • Your synopsis has to be relevant and precise;
  • Your synopsis has to be interesting and informative.

The Objective

After your synopsis is ready, you need to include the objective of your case study. Pay attention that this section is to include all the questions related to the legal case study chosen. Let us familiarize you with the rules followed by our talented experts:

  • Write this section in a question format;
  • Make sure the specified goals are relevant to the topic of your paper. Otherwise, you will mislead your audience;
  • Avoid wordiness.

As soon as you are done writing the main goals and objectives, you will need to introduce the case to the professor in a detailed manner.

Case Analysis

This section is the most important part of your document. Thus, it requires maximum attention. As the name suggests, this part is to include vital information about the case. The main elements of an in-depth case study analysis are as follows:

  • Facts and figures. In accordance with the common standards of legal writing, this part is to include information about the parties involved;
  • Issue. Although you have already briefly described the topic in the synopsis section, you will need to add more details to your analysis as it will help you get additional points. Yet, you ought not to repeat the information that was already provided. Instead, you need to make your scenario more informative by adding more details to it;
  • Holding. All the laws applied during the legal dispute are to appear in your paper. In the majority of cases, students fail to include these laws, which results in getting unsatisfactory grades;
  • Rationale. Mentioning the laws applied won`t help you convince your professor that you know the subject well. To get an A+ grade, you will also need to mention the reason for the holdings.

Methodology

Another reason why students usually look for professional help with their legal tasks is having poor research skills. It is particularly important to collect appropriate evidence from credible academic sources to write a good paper. For instance, you may look for newspapers, academic journals, blogs, etc. All the information used in your paper is to be accordingly cited in accordance with the formatting requirements of the style indicated in your prompt. We strongly recommend you study the prompt to figure out what style you are supposed to follow, APA, MLA, Harvard, or any other.

Modification Notes

Any information that is not related to the research process is to be included in this section. If you are unsure what information to add to your document, you can get in touch with our writing team and we will take good care of your assignment. Each expert working at our service knows how to write a law case study assignment of exceptional quality. By delegating your task to us, you will not only get a well-written document but also boost your own legal writing proficiency.

Business Law Case Study Example

Triffin v. Dillabough and Estate of Ostlund v. Ostlund Case Studies

Triffin v. Dillabough

Summary of the existing facts

Two American Express money orders on December 11, 1990, in the amount of $650 and $550 respectively, were presented to (Chuckie’s), Chuckie Enterprise, Inc. a Philadelphia based check-cashing operation and the monies were payable to Stacey Anne Dillabough. Photo identifications were provided and money orders were duly indorsed by the payee; whereby, the face amounts got dully paid by Chuckie’s minus a 2 percent fee.

Actually, the money had been initially stolen from the premises of an agent of the American Express company. The money orders before being stolen, had already been signed with the Chairman of American Express preprinted signatures, but as to date, payee, amount and sender were blank. However, when presented at Chuckie’s, persons unknown had completed the blanks.

The money orders were presented for payment at Colorado, United Bank of Grand Junction, after passing through the usual banking channels. After noticing, that the money orders were initially stolen, American Express, wrote on its fraud logs, and returned them after marking them, lost or reported lost. They also advised against re-depositing the money orders and they never paid the amounts stated.

As a commercial discounter, Triffin purchased from Chuckie’s the dishonored money orders for cash and took an assignment of all of Chuckie’s claims, rights and money order interests. It also brought from American Express and Dillabough suit demanding payment of their stolen money orders. Against Dillabough, the judgment was entered by default, and a verdict in favor of American Express was passed by the trial court, which was appealed by Triffin.

Issues/Problem Identification

The main problem here is if the blank money orders, which prior to being sold got stolen and without subsequent authorization got completed, can still be considered as genuine instruments of negotiation. If they are, in due course, whether the holder has any claim to the instrument in question payments despite the initial lack of delivery and consideration.

Analysis/Evaluation

It is not in dispute that as Triffin’s assignor Chuckie’s, in due course was a holder, then Triffin in due course would also stands in the shoes of a holder. No specific determination were made by the trial court that disputed Chuckie’s as a holder. However, the court after hearing the evidence, express its belief that when it paid value for the money orders, it believed Chuckie’s, had acted in good faith. American Express asserts that the printed legend found on each instruments backside, and with the circumstances surrounding the transactions, if combined upon Chuckie’s created a heightened duty of inquiry that served as notice of avoid ability that was contrary to the initially established good faith.

We hold that contrary to American Express’s position, the subject transactions circumstances were not of a suspicious nature that would warranty heightening of Chuckie’s inquiry, to ascertain the necessary good and elements needed by the owner in the course of the due process. Dillabough was required by Chuckie’s to produce proper photo identification. The customers could also be identified by Chuckie’s due to the earlier transactions. The sender’s surname mere illegibility did not suggest or indicate that from a suspicion further inquiry would arise that would disclose a defect or vise in the title.

Another analysis is on the argument proposed by the American Express that states that due to the alteration or theft of the money order and the instruments states that the money won’t be paid. There should instead have been an inquiry by Chuckies to the American Express on the probability of the money order payments. However, according to the Pennsylvania general rules, there is no affirmative duty to inquire, and if such a duty exists, it would only raise suspicion on the titles defects and vices.

With the above analysis it can be stated that in the due course of the two American Express money orders Chuckie’s was a holder, and with that by assignment Triffins, therefore holds similar instruments rights as initially held by Chuckies.

Recommendations

The recommendations would be that in due course to be awarded rights similar to the holder, there must first be good faith expressed by the person claiming the instrumental status. This was however not shown by the above case.

Estate of Ostlund v. Ostlund

Summary of the existing facts

The disposition of a joint account is what makes up the bulk of this case study, it analyses one of the parties to the account after the partner dies and the right to certain payable checks to the decedents that after the decedent’s death were paid in the joint account. Ostlund Sr., the plaintiff on the estate of Calvert appeals a ruling that showed that the estate, joint account balances that the decadents Calvert Ostlund, established and other payable checks deposited by one of the defendants, Calvert Ostlund, Jr were payable to the decedent, and are now property of junior prior to the decedent death.

Issues/Problem Identification

Plaintiff states that the account funds should be the estates property; to be later equally subdivided between stepchildren and decadents five children according to the will of the decedents. Survivorship to Junior

Analysis/Evaluation

When determining the presence of a confidential relationship the factors to be considered include whether confidence and trust exists between the parties, dealing in terms of one side having superior knowledge on the transactions, possible effects and details based on a fiduciary relationship. Another one is whether they are transacting in forms of quality, whether one side is dependent or weak or whether one side has exerted over-mastering influence over the other. There were, however, no confidential relationship found that linked decedent and Junior.

According to the records, there is now relevant, competent and reasonable evidence that the decedent during the creation of this account was of sane mind, was working and lived independently in his apartment in New York. There is also evidence that he remained a stubborn man, even after consulting with attorneys he chose himself, he did have a health problem though. The findings of the trial judge’s accordingly centralize on reasonably credible evidence that is both relevant and competent and thus his verdict that there was no existence of a confidential relationship is valid. The fact that unlike the decedent the checks were never directly received in the estate or through agency delivery, plaintiff could not assert a conversion of checks claim, since he was never a checks holder, thus could not claim what it initially never had.

At the outset, plaintiff, by the use of an evidence proponent, has the burden to prove that there is an existence of a confidential relationship. As the fact finder the trial court here, found no confidential relationship between Junior and decedent, there is no tangible evidence that proves any relation between Calvert Ostlund, Jr and Calvert Ostlund, Sr. No evidence of subservience or dependence were ever found by the trial judge, on the period the account opened. All that could be proved was the mere family relation that existed between junior and decedent. The judge, in essence found a failure of necessary proofs to show inequality between the parties that would reach a confidentiality level type of relationship.

Recommendation

The above set of statutory tests for establishing a genuine ownership in case of death in a joint bank account, would have worked much better if the supposed challenger had been able to support his claims of close or confidential relationship with the accounts owner or donor. Through, this means there is an often-undue influence presumption that the challenger must support by convincing and clear evidence.

Law Case Study Assignment Help

Students usually look for professional writing help because of the lack of time or writing skills. Also, they may fail to understand the instructions provided by their tutors or may have personal matters that do not allow them to focus on academic writing. Yet, such reasons ought not to put their academic reputation at risk. Luckily, there is a solution that helps students balance their studies and personal life without compromising their academic performance. If you have no idea how to write a legal case study or you have no time to work on your project, you can rely on our professional writing team. Having many knowledgeable and experienced specialists in our team, we are capable of meeting the most challenging guidelines.

ExclusiveThesis.com is the best place to order “write legal case study projects” help. The papers purchased at our service will serve as your templates for further assignments. No matter what kind of writing help you are seeking, we will find a proficient expert to work on your task. With us, you will be able to get good grades for your papers without neglecting your personal life. For instance, you can meet your friends, go to a gym, or watch your favorite film while one of our proficient writers will work on your paper. When you entrust your law case study assignment to our team, you can forget about missed deadlines, plagiarism, and other problems. The assigned writer will do the task thoroughly paying attention to all of your requirements. As a result of our partnership, you will get a customized document that will bring you the anticipated grade. So if you have no idea how to answer law case study questions, leave this task to professionals and we will save you from the pressure!